What It Takes To Further Develop ProTrak | General Discussions | Forum

Welcome to the ProTrak User Community Support Forum . The forum is designed around the chapters in The Manual. Please post your questions in the appropriate subforums. You may "Subscribe" to topics and reply by email.


Please consider registering

sp_LogInOut Log In sp_Registration Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —

— Match —

— Forum Options —

Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

sp_Feed Topic RSS sp_Print sp_TopicIcon
What It Takes To Further Develop ProTrak
July 22, 2018
6:59 pm
James Switzer
Forum Posts: 14
Member Since:
May 24, 2016
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline


James Moir estimated the total number of potential ProTrak operators to be about 350 users.  He thought the price point should be about 1 Kato, DCC equipped, loco.  For the amount of time Jim put into support and the amount of time it took to code things, there was no financial advantage.  ProTrak was well and truly a labor of love.

From the time I first started testing ProTrak, about 1986, until today, I have used operations and management software plus logistics software in my "business management career".  That software runs between $7k, to $65k, to well over $100k.  Given the small market ProTrak is, I'm estimating ProTrak would retail for about $6.5k plus purchased support costs.

That is just a prohibitive cost for software.

I hope that those who use the software, and those who have used the software, realize what an amazing value it offers … buggy or not.


Best regards,


The following users say thank you to James Switzer for this useful post:

Mark Stafflrd
July 22, 2018
7:20 pm
Mark Stafflrd
Forum Posts: 55
Member Since:
June 14, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

James trust me if I say I always have known what a total bargain the Protrak software licence represented.  In a past life I worked first for a software development team for the biggest telephone company here in Australia and latter for IBM as a systems architect.  I always knew that there was (virtually) no profit in what Jim did for us. 

But on the other hand Jim shared his passion for his hobby (and my guess is that Protrak was a very significant part of his railway hobby) with the rest of us at a cost that bared little to no relationship with the effort required to develop it in the first place.

That level of commitment and pure artistry of Jim’s code are in my opinion worthy of the highest possible praise.  I know that there is no way I could have produced what Jim did.  That was my reasoning behind trying to preserve and ensure his effort in an ongoing way.

Mark Stafford

July 22, 2018
8:43 pm
Forum Posts: 224
Member Since:
May 11, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Excellent thoughts well said, Mark.  We are all still feeling Jim's loss, as a good friend, a fellow model railroader, and our Protrak guru.  He will be ever missed by all of us. Best, Andy 

Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android On Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 20:20, ProTrak.org wrote:

The following users say thank you to Nashville for this useful post:

Mark Stafflrd

Best, Andy Keeney

Look out for #1 but don't step in #2!!

Forum Timezone: America/Chicago

Most Users Ever Online: 30

Currently Online:
4 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

Nashville: 224

Joe-SVL: 141

casowest: 81

Jim Brewer: 77

Mark Stafflrd: 55

Bob: 37

Fred: 28

Peter Jackson: 23

jjoyce1: 21

Sigma8510: 18

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 0

Members: 116

Moderators: 0

Admins: 4

Forum Stats:

Groups: 2

Forums: 10

Topics: 365

Posts: 1483

Newest Members:

dfender, mjchern, sooline, Pavlo, rkotsonis, render2017, athenasowl, bearman, t.gregory, bdrake844

Administrators: earlyrail: 55, friscomike: 106, hunter48820: 22, Jim Moir: 489