The Genesis Of ProTrak | General Discussions | Forum

Welcome to the ProTrak User Community Support Forum . The forum is designed around the chapters in The Manual. Please post your questions in the appropriate subforums. You may "Subscribe" to topics and reply by email.

A A A
Avatar

Please consider registering
guest

sp_LogInOut Log In sp_Registration Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —






— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

sp_Feed Topic RSS sp_Print sp_TopicIcon
The Genesis Of ProTrak
October 10, 2018
4:10 pm
Avatar
James Switzer
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 21
Member Since:
May 24, 2016
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Hello all,

There has been interest of late in advancing development work on ProTrak. Based on conversations with others, I'm not certain the actual purpose of ProTrak is as well known as it might be.

Mike Moir, Jim's brother has offered this overview of ProTrak.  Mike wrote:

Brother Jim’s motivation for Protrak was found in his interest in physical models. Just as he had modeled the action of water waves physically in his civil engineering life, he wanted to produce a model railroad that acted like the real thing. To do this he needed to include accurate model weights and properly scaled locomotive requirements for the loads and grades of the railroad. This led to modeling real operations and producing a model environment that modeled real freight forwarding and prototypical car movement and even down to modeling the economics of the operation. Hence Protrak.

A week before Jim's passing, and with the involvement of Jim's brother, , we were experimenting with throttles with feedback to them. An example of this feedback would be a vibration felt within the throttle when couplers came in contact with each other. There were lots of other feedback ideas floating around too.

I am hopeful there is a much better understanding of what ProTrak is - the real design objective, and how hard it is to find the right way to move the current software forward to enable the accurate modeling of a railroad .... right down to the profitability.

Kind regards
JS  
Forum Timezone: America/Chicago

Most Users Ever Online: 189

Currently Online:
4 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

Nashville: 248

Joe-SVL: 243

casowest: 95

Jim Brewer: 92

Mark Stafflrd: 58

Bob: 53

Fred: 43

John V: 43

jjoyce1: 32

Peter Jackson: 27

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 0

Members: 259

Moderators: 0

Admins: 5

Forum Stats:

Groups: 3

Forums: 13

Topics: 432

Posts: 1815

Newest Members:

Fred52, ferretjack, Frank, bcole_-8@rogers.com, frich1230, waffle2@mac.com, innovativerc@gmail.com, KRFARRINGTON, George Giles, NandWSRY55

Administrators: earlyrail: 71, friscomike: 130, webmaster: 1, hunter48820: 23, Jim Moir: 489