various yard related comments/problems | Operations | Forum

Welcome to the ProTrak User Community Support Forum . The forum is designed around the chapters in The Manual. Please post your questions in the appropriate subforums. You may "Subscribe" to topics and reply by email.

A A A
Avatar

Please consider registering
guest

sp_LogInOut Log In sp_Registration Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —






— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

sp_Feed Topic RSS sp_Print sp_TopicIcon
various yard related comments/problems
December 9, 2016
8:20 am
Avatar
casowest
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 95
Member Since:
May 8, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Hello everyone,

I'm currently improving the Sarnia and St. Thomas (Talbotville) C&O yards and have a few comments and questions.  Tal-Yd is on the main line thru Ontario between Detroit and Buffalo staging.  It currently serves 6 daily thru fast freights, a local turn out of Sarnia, Transfers to the NYC yard in St. Thomas, and local industries.  

Sar-Yd serves the large local petrochemical industry and the car float across the St. Clair River to Port Huron, Michigan (a virtual yd on my layout).  It services one fast freight to/from Buffalo staging, a local turn to Tal-Yd (east bound) and a local turn to Windsor Yard.  It is a dead end, so the cars are either going to a Sarnia industry or on the car float.

Jim, I like the new feature providing thru put info for yards on the layout and it is providing valuable info for my new yards.  As it is dynamic, did you consider putting it in the ops section of PT, maybe as a separate heading in Yarmaster?  I confess that I looked all over in the Yardmaster Function, before finding it in the Yards and Interchanges section.

Comments/Questions

1.  So far in my op session, although still very early,  Sarnia yard only has 6 cars reported as classified, yet i had one turn arrive with 12 cars that it left there, as well as 13 cars off the car float.  I did not get a cut list printed automatically (or at least the question asked of me).  The yard switcher picked up cars from the local industries, and i think that accounts for the 6 cars were counted by PT.  I currently run the car float twice per day, with up to 12 cars both ways. So far in the session, I have run the float once, with 12 cars arriving in Sarnia.  The car float loading/unloading printout already serves as the cutlist on arrival, so maybe they haven't been counted by PT in this new routine.

2. In setting up the blocking for the two yards, I looked for the ferry PM#10 as a potential block, but it is not available.  I guess that it is looked at by PT as a through train, which are not available in the yard blocking scheme.  So, I chose Port Huron (PRT-Yd) as the block for a track.  (Should I use PRT-Yd or SAR-Yd as the block now??)  Given that the focus is the car float ops (variously called the Ferry Yard or the Boat Yard on the prototype), would you consider treating it like a staging track or a local train in the blocking schemes for other yards?  

3.  When revising Port Huron Yd (which is virtual, along with several virtual industries),  I tried to  identify TAL-Yd as the storage yard and PT would not accept it, as there was no "Connecting Train" between the two yards.  The connection is the car float operation.

4. Two trains serve Sarnia on the same route between TAL-Yd and SAR-Yd, the fast freight from Buffalo arrives about 2 am for the first sailing of PM#10 at about 4 am, and the second is a local turn that also serves an intermediate Yard in Chatham (CHT-Yd).  It it timed to deliver cars to/from the second sailing of the PM#10.  The problem is that cars get assigned to the FF, which can't take all of them, but they don't get re-assigned to the local later in the day which can take them.  How do I deal with this??

5. I'm using the Switchlist Preview in Ops a lot now because I have passenger trains that I want to re-block, change the motive power, etc, before sending them on their way.  PT automatically prints the Passenger Train List when you click on it in Report Trains in Ops. Well, it is printing (and sailing) for PM#10 in both PT locations.  Would you please change this in the "Preview Switchlist".

Thanks

John

December 10, 2016
6:52 am
Avatar
Jim Moir
Admin
Forum Posts: 489
Member Since:
December 23, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

John M. asked:

>As it is dynamic, did you consider putting it in the ops section of PT, maybe as a separate heading in Yardmaster? 

Yes, the data could be added into Operations.

I have been awaiting feedback as to where you would to see this data displayed.

                Jim

December 10, 2016
6:56 am
Avatar
Jim Moir
Admin
Forum Posts: 489
Member Since:
December 23, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

John asked, in referring to the passenger-train-consist: >"Would you please change this in the "Preview Switchlist".

Yes.  OK.

             Jim

December 10, 2016
8:05 am
Avatar
Joe-SVL
32826
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 243
Member Since:
April 26, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Jim,

It took me quite a while to find the yard listing where you added the two new columns. Now that I've found it a) the list doesn't seem to get zeroed when the Daily Summary (full update) runs,  b) I like John M always have 0 cars set off and some number of cars classified, and c) I think it would be a nice addition to ALSO have that data available as one of the Yardmaster options so that we could look at the data during a session as well as at the end of a session.

Joe B

December 10, 2016
12:22 pm
Avatar
Bob
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 53
Member Since:
April 26, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

This information would be good to see when running paper sessions and while designing the layout.

Very nice addition to the program

Bob B

December 10, 2016
1:59 pm
Avatar
Jim Moir
Admin
Forum Posts: 489
Member Since:
December 23, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

>the list doesn't seem to get zeroed when the Daily Summary (full update) runs

The file is zero'ed when the Daily Summary starts.   One of the last actions in the Daily Summary is the FP (FileProcessor) running.  FP runs the classification routines.   If cars are assigned to blocks/trains, at that time, those cars will be listed as "classified".

              Jim

December 13, 2016
7:56 am
Avatar
Jim Moir
Admin
Forum Posts: 489
Member Since:
December 23, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

John M. noted:

>When revising Port Huron Yd (which is virtual, along with several virtual industries),  I tried to  identify TAL-Yd as the storage yard

Checked this.  The program lists all "Yd" yards and all "y" tracks as potential storage yards (in the dropdown).  There are no limits or restrictions on which yards are listed.

With one possible exception.... the program stops looking in the list of customers at the "Industry Limit" which is listed under Administration/Limits".   However I think this is not the issue here.

                   Jim

December 15, 2016
10:50 pm
Avatar
casowest
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 95
Member Since:
May 8, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Hi Jim,

No the problem is that there is "no connecting train" between the two yards.  The problem has to do with the ferry, PT is not recognizing it as the connecting train.

John

December 16, 2016
6:28 am
Avatar
Jim Moir
Admin
Forum Posts: 489
Member Since:
December 23, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

> I tried to  identify TAL-Yd as the storage yard

Are we talking about the same thing?  Is this about setting a storage yard, or routing of cars?

The storage yard setting I was talking about is on the "edit Yard" window.   It is a dropdown from which the storage yard is selected.

Is that what you were talking about?

              Jim

              

December 16, 2016
3:43 pm
Avatar
casowest
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 95
Member Since:
May 8, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Jim,

Yes, in the edit yard window, I was trying to set talbot Yd as the storage yard for port Huron Yd, but the program would not allow it because there was "no connecting train".  I am making the guess that PT did not recognize the ferry PM#10 as the actual train in the chain between the two yards, as I had already set up talbot Yd earlier as a storage Yd for both Sarnia Yd and Chatham Yd  successfully.  (For those who don't know the geography, these two yards are intermediate between Port Huron and Talbotville.

This may also affect car routing as well, as I have noted a few anomalies when looking at the routing of individual cars, but I did not take notes as it didn't seem to be a big problem.  Some Cars to and from port Huron seem at times to be a little confused about their next Yd.

john 

December 17, 2016
8:22 am
Avatar
Jim Moir
Admin
Forum Posts: 489
Member Since:
December 23, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

John,

Are you seeing the optional message about "setting up storage trains"?

If so, answer "No".  (Or, "Yes".)

Either way this has no effect on setting a storage yard.   (The question appears after the yard data has been saved.)

~~~

I will make this option message more clear that it is an option.

                 Jim

December 17, 2016
12:41 pm
Avatar
casowest
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 95
Member Since:
May 8, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

No, no message about storage trains.

I just want the cars to go by regular trains, I won't have many cars to store, neither in Tal-Yd (C&O) nor in Tom-Yd (NYC).

John

Forum Timezone: America/Chicago

Most Users Ever Online: 189

Currently Online:
4 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

Nashville: 248

Joe-SVL: 243

casowest: 95

Jim Brewer: 92

Mark Stafflrd: 58

Bob: 53

Fred: 43

John V: 43

jjoyce1: 32

Peter Jackson: 27

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 0

Members: 259

Moderators: 0

Admins: 5

Forum Stats:

Groups: 3

Forums: 13

Topics: 432

Posts: 1815

Newest Members:

Fred52, ferretjack, Frank, bcole_-8@rogers.com, frich1230, waffle2@mac.com, innovativerc@gmail.com, KRFARRINGTON, George Giles, NandWSRY55

Administrators: earlyrail: 71, friscomike: 130, webmaster: 1, hunter48820: 23, Jim Moir: 489