saving "last reporting time": Update 326, Saturday March 5th, 2016 | User Updates | Forum

Welcome to the ProTrak User Community Support Forum . The forum is designed around the chapters in The Manual. Please post your questions in the appropriate subforums. You may "Subscribe" to topics and reply by email.

A A A
Avatar

Please consider registering
guest

sp_LogInOut Log In sp_Registration Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —






— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

sp_Feed Topic RSS sp_Print sp_TopicIcon
saving "last reporting time": Update 326, Saturday March 5th, 2016
March 5, 2016
10:22 am
Avatar
Jim Moir
Admin
Forum Posts: 489
Member Since:
December 23, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Peter noted two issues related to going out of and back into Operations.  One was that a job now moving on alternative symbols was not saved as such and the other was that the "last reporting time" was not being saved.

Today's Update corrects both these issues:

               Jim

March 6, 2016
5:04 pm
Avatar
Peter Jackson
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 27
Member Since:
April 26, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Thanks for the update correcting these issues Jim

I just finished a computer simulation and they worked perfectly.

There is one small annoyance which I can see why it occurs since I'm using ATS.  When the ATS shows on the Reporting Trains panel in Operations it occupies the train position of the base train.  This means that even though the reporting time is correct the sequencing of trains is now not by timetable time.  It is easy enough to click on the departure time column to re-order the display but every time you report a train it reverts to the train order listing.

Is there a way to make the display "sticky"?  In other words, make it stay ordered by departure time until the operator clicks on a different column?

The use of ATS seems to be working well even with the constant changing of assigned equipment.  Haven't done enough yet to say so categorically but everything is encouraging so far.

 

Cheers

 

Peter

March 8, 2016
6:22 am
Avatar
Jim Moir
Admin
Forum Posts: 489
Member Since:
December 23, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Peter,

Thank you for the heads-up.

Normally the time is sorted and is "sticky" (as are #, symbol, location and next destination).  

However I just discovered that if there is an extra ("add to plan"), the code from 2012 kicks an error which bypasses the sorting routine.  I have corrected that.   Next Update.

              Jim

Forum Timezone: America/Chicago

Most Users Ever Online: 189

Currently Online:
4 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

Nashville: 248

Joe-SVL: 243

casowest: 95

Jim Brewer: 92

Mark Stafflrd: 58

Bob: 53

Fred: 43

John V: 43

jjoyce1: 32

Peter Jackson: 27

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 0

Members: 259

Moderators: 0

Admins: 5

Forum Stats:

Groups: 3

Forums: 13

Topics: 432

Posts: 1815

Newest Members:

Fred52, ferretjack, Frank, bcole_-8@rogers.com, frich1230, waffle2@mac.com, innovativerc@gmail.com, KRFARRINGTON, George Giles, NandWSRY55

Administrators: earlyrail: 71, friscomike: 130, webmaster: 1, hunter48820: 23, Jim Moir: 489